On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 06:27:59PM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > OK, I know this is going to be painful, but we need to solve this (FESCo > is waiting for us to do it), and I think this is the cleanest way: > > Please review: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/LicenseTag > and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing . > > We'll vote on it next week. What I'm missing is the reason this has to change. Obviously someone made lots of noise about it and the current model is inadequate for whomever needs. Before jumping through loops to understand what which lawyer from where wanted to do with this information, maybe it would be helpful to outline the bird's eye sepcification? All I currently see is a mountain of bureaucracy falling on us. Some background information can make us understand the need and perhaps even heöp us make better counter suggestions. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgp9Ve8R5ZvKY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
