On Tuesday 15 January 2008 16:03:28 Patrice Dumas wrote: > Hello, > > In tex/latex bundled in fedora (I guess it comes from tetex and it is > now in texlive) there is a simple system to view documentation. The > files are found below /usr/share/texmf/doc using kpathsea (so hopefully > rapidly) and opened using the appropriate application (currently using > xdg-open for everything...). > > In fedora should we use this system and put the doc files below > /usr/share/texmf/doc/ or use %doc? Notice that this is in line with other languages, the documentation for R packages (as an example) in under the R tree. I would like to favour the texmf tree as the natural packaging place of latex documentation. The package that started this discussion is the review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428686 I would like to use this package to be an example to draft the fedora (la)tex package guidelines. Sooner or later we need them and now is good time. :-) Notice that the package follows the consensus on this list in August, naming the package as tex-simplecv. All feedback is welcome. :-) > -- > Pat -- José Abílio -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
