On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 13:10 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > i'm wondering if there might be some benefit to repackaging some of > > the docbook-related packages. > > > > first, there are the two "utils" packages: > > > > docbook-utils > > docbook-utils-pdf > > We're not mandating this split. You should open a bug against this > package and see if the maintainer is willing to stop doing it. ok, just so long as there was no obvious rationale about that split that i was overlooking. thanks. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Home page: http://crashcourse.ca Fedora Cookbook: http://crashcourse.ca/wiki/index.php/Fedora_Cookbook ======================================================================== -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
