On Saturday 28 July 2007 19:01:11 Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > I know that the complete lack of %defattr is problematic, but I'm not > sure whether "%defattr(-,root,root)" is a blocker or not. The only Why is it sometimes %defattr(-,root,root) and sometimes %defattr(-,root,root,-) (which is what rpmdev-newspec generates)? Regards, Till
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
