Re: rpmlint check for proper %defattr?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2007-07-28 at 21:25 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> Why is it sometimes %defattr(-,root,root) and 
> sometimes %defattr(-,root,root,-) (which is what rpmdev-newspec generates)?

I believe the complete spec for %defattr is:

"%defattr" "(" fileperms ["," user-owner ["," group-owner [","
dirperms] ] ] ")"

with "-" in {file,dir}perms meaning no change from what it already has.

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet@xxxxxxxxx>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux