On Sat, 28 Jul 2007, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
On Sat, 2007-07-28 at 21:25 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
Why is it sometimes %defattr(-,root,root) and
sometimes %defattr(-,root,root,-) (which is what rpmdev-newspec generates)?
I believe the complete spec for %defattr is:
"%defattr" "(" fileperms ["," user-owner ["," group-owner [","
dirperms] ] ] ")"
with "-" in {file,dir}perms meaning no change from what it already has.
Yup.
If something, rpmlint should check for unattributed files: ones that
aren't covered by %defattr or file-specific %attr. Missing %defattr isn't
an error, totally unattributed files are (or should be treated as such,
perhaps on rpmbuild level) because the outcome then relies on who happens
to build the package.
- Panu -
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
