Re: Should vim-X11 conflict with vim-enhanced ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2008/1/15, Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Is there an easy way to compare the amount of packages that need to be
> installed for vim-X11 but do not need to be installed for vim-enhanced?
>

Here's the list of packages that are required by vim-X11 and NOT
required by vim-enhanced:

atk-1.20.0-1.fc8.x86_64
cairo-1.4.12-1.fc8.x86_64
glib2-2.14.4-1.fc8.x86_64
gtk2-2.12.3-3.fc8.i386
gtk2-2.12.3-3.fc8.x86_64
libICE-1.0.4-2.fc8.x86_64
libSM-1.0.2-4.fc8.x86_64
libX11-1.1.3-4.fc8.x86_64
libXt-1.0.4-3.fc8.x86_64
libattr-2.4.38-2.fc8.i386
libattr-2.4.38-2.fc8.x86_64
pango-1.18.3-1.fc8.x86_64

-- 
Michał Bentkowski
mr.ecik@xxxxxxxxx

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux