Re: Texlive packaging and "Errata packages"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 09:28:53PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Another alternative is to package the texmf tree more modular, which
> would not only help to reduce space consumption for updates, but also
> for the initial installation - not everybody who uses latex also has
> a burning need for context...

+1

Further modularization seems to be the best way how to do this in the
future. The current subpackage structure is designed for easy adoption
by the packages dependent on tetex so that it's almost identical.
The current strategy is to replace tetex with texlive in F8 in a way
that a minimal overhead is needed from the other package maintainers, so
that it can be done smoothly and quickly.

Jindrich

-- 
Jindrich Novy <jnovy@xxxxxxxxxx>   http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux