Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 13:30 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
I've been working my way through my packages, updating the license
fields as appropriate. I just came across perl-Tie-EncryptedHash, which
is under the Artistic license (only). If this is not an acceptable
license, the package will have to go, and so will perl-Crypt-RSA (which
depends on it) and anything else that depends on that.
Would you ask upstream if they'd be willing to relicense either under
the same terms as perl or Artistic 2.0?
Done.
http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=28813
Paul.
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
