Le Jeu 23 août 2007 11:52, Patrice Dumas a écrit : > It is not always worth creating a filesystem package for these cases. > Simply having more than one package own the directory is simpler, and > although not perfect, acceptable. When two packages share a directory sure it's not worth creating a separate package just for this directory. What I was suggesting was more like the games SIG collecting all the stray directories in a filesystem-games package, same for the perl SIG, etc Certainly there is a level at which you can create useful filesystem packages without falling in the whole-repository or single-directory package traps. That being said multiple ownership is compliant with the strict guidelines version, what I object to is no ownership as suggested by the lax variant. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
