On 30/08/2007, Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> wrote: > I think that there are 2 distinct issues that are raised in your > proposal > > * tex related package names > * virtual requires/provides > > I think that they should be discussed apart. The second issue could be > solved simply without the packaging commitee ruling, but by asking > Jindrich to add the virtual provide. Then the use of this provide could > be advocated in the guidelines. > Yep. > I suggest discussing the virtual provides in one of the texlive > submissions. > OK. > For the tex related package names, my personnal point of view would be > not to distinguish tex and latex add-ons (at least in the name). I have > a slight preference for prepending tex- to all the tex/latex related > packages. > Yes - I favour that too, but put other suggestions up there for consideration. > -- > Pat > > -- > Fedora-packaging mailing list > Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging > -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
