On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 11:12:16AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Florian La Roche wrote on fedora-maintainers > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 07:41:55AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > >> Florian La Roche wrote: > > >> > anything holding back an update of the default snippets we > >> > propose for Fedora until a more permanent solution in > >> > rpm/tools is available? > > >> The Snippets wiki has been updated, after getting feedback on the > >> fedora-desktop list. > > > it still says that no deps are needed, but should list a dependency > > for touch/coreutils in there. > > At first, I thought > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-4cadce5e79d38a63cad3941de1dadc9d25d67d30-2 > applied here, but that's only for BuildRequires. > > Do we need to come up with a similar list for packages assumed to be present > at run-time, stuff like: > glibc kernel coreutils > ?? glibc is always pulled in via rpm's soname dependency mechanism, kernel please not, as it is already a pain to run a chroot w/o a kernel due to some dependencies. coreutils probably yes, but some packages need to be exempted (probably filesystem and setup) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpfMz7Xflnhu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
