On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 10:05:29PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 02:16 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 04:34:00PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > > (And I nominate "+=" as the most logical and ugliest operator for the > > > job :-) > > > > > > A comparison operator (>=) would make more sense > > Your nomination is definitely more logical, but no less ugly :-( > > License: GPLv2 >= || MPLv1.1 I didn't imply postfix notation. > We could break the version apart from the license tag. I don't know if > that makes it harder for spot's use case or not:: > > License: GPL >= v2 || MPL == v1.1 Me thinks that spot and anyone else will be more than capable to parse anything properly, even if it's "or" instead of "||" and ">=" instead of "+=$%&/§" The most important thing is to not disrupt current packaging practices too much. What this means is that if 99% of current "GPL >= v2" packages have "GPL" in their License: tag, then simply define "GPL" to mean that and only fix th remain one percent. Currently it looks like there would be a mass rebuild for License tags only. I'm all for at least one mass rebuild per release, but not for a retagging of Licenses to Polish notation like parsing structures. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpKXech9yjCx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
