On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 10:33 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > I presume, though it's not explicitly stated, that GPL+ can also be used > where the license is explicitly given as "GPL version 1 or later" (e.g. > for perl and all same-as-perl licensed modules)? Yes, this correct. > Similarly, I take LGPL+ to be suitable for packages licensed as "LGPL v2 > (not 2.1) or later" as well as for LGPL of unspecified version? Not quite: LGPL+ is only for unversioned LGPL (I've never seen this, but it's possible). LGPLv2+ is for LGPL 2/2.1 or later. ~spot -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
