On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 03:42:57PM -0400, Neal Becker wrote: > Axel Thimm wrote: > >> - (partly a question for the Packaging committee as well) The > >> current Kernel Module standard was not only meant for Fedora, but > >> for RHEL also and a suggested one for 3rd party Fedora-repos as > >> well. Are those still a goal? If not: will the stuff simply be > >> removed from the Guidelines, to make them easier to read? [...] > > > > Remove kmod and introduce kmdl2? > > Pointer? (google kmdl2 doesn't lead anywhere) It's the kmdl API with more encapsulated parts (e.g. even smaller specfiles) and a shifting helper package removing the neccessity of yum plugins and thus working the same on yum/apt/smart/any depsolver. There is also a dkmdl subsystem to make dkms users happy It's not yet released though as my real life has gotten in the way. But it's better than sliced bread, I'd dare compare it to peanut butter. ;) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpBLrt5oVk6T.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
