On Friday 21 March 2008, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > I've added another draft to the todo list: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/NoBitsInSrv > > I doubt we'll get to it on Tuesday, but we'll get to it eventually. If this passes, it needs a statement what to do with packages that already use /srv in a way that conflicts with the draft. /srv/foo is typically data, potentially lots and lots of it, so auto-migrations are practically out of the question and manual ones are possibly nontrivial amounts of admin work. Therefore I'd suggest letting them stay as is. -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
