On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 23:33 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 05:19 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 13:27 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > > Sérgio Durigan Júnior wrote:
> > >
> > > > Well, what happens is that in some archs (specifically PowerPC in our
> > > > case) it's very common to have a biarch environment (i.e., 64-bit kernel
> > > > and mixed 32/64-bit userspace), so it's not a strange thing to have both
> > > > versions of some software installed in the system.
> > >
> > > Right. If there are 32/64 packages available, and they don't properly
> > > install/run, then that's generally considered a bug (that should be fixed).
> >
> > Here is one:
> >
> > # rpm -q --qf "%{name}.%{arch}\n" -f /lib/libgcc_s.so.1
> > libgcc.i386
> >
> > # rpm -q --qf "%{name}.%{arch}\n" -f \
> > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/32/libgcc_s.so
> > gcc.x86_64
> >
> > # ls -l /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/32/libgcc_s.so
> > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/32/libgcc_s.so
> > -> /lib/libgcc_s.so.1
> >
> > i.e. an x86_64 package depending on an i386 package.
> >
> >
> > Now try to install /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 in an x86_64 mock chroot.
> >
> > I am trying to package a package which needs to build and run some bits
> > "-m32 compiled on x86_64". Works in a normal (multilib'ed x86_64)
> > environment, but I haven't managed to get this working in mock.
> >
> >
>
> try using yum 3.2.14 from rawhide with mock and remove the silly exclude
> that's in mock currently for x86_64 builds.
OK, this will likely resolve the "mock" part of this issue (yet
untested), but leaves other parts unclear:
Which rpm "arch" and which package does the
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.3.0/32/libgcc_s.so
-> /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 symlink belong to?
ATM, it is part of gcc.x86_86 and is a dangling symlink in "pure
basearch" installs.
Should it (or even the whole m32 subdir) be part of an *.i386 package?
Or, conversely should /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (clearly i386'ed) be part of a
"multilib'ed" gcc.x86_64 package or libgcc.x86_64 package?
I don't know.
Ralf
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
