Patrice Dumas (pertusus@xxxxxxx) said: > On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 09:51:32PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > Hi. > > > > While reviewing a package, I stumbled across the use of alternatives > > and found out it's not regulated in any way in Fedora. So far, I've > > encountered three ways of handling the symlinks that are set up using > > alternatives: > > 1. some packages have Provides: for them (like cups or postfix), > > Not all files are provided, only > /usr/bin/mailq > /usr/bin/newaliases > /usr/bin/rmail > /usr/sbin/sendmail > while man pages are not provided. I think it is right like this. Files have to be 'provided' so things that depend on them can work. Hopefully nothing depends on man pages. Bill -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
