On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 12:40 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Given a single SRPM generating multiple sub-RPMs, some of which depend > on each other, how hard should the maintainer try to ensure that > matching versions of the sub-RPMs are installed? Possible answers > include: > > 1. Do nothing, rely on automatically generated requires (eg, the major > version of a shared library's soname). Maximum flexibility, maximum > possibility of allowing installations that don't actually work. Show me a package that would break if a different version library was used that has the same soname and I'll show you a developer that needs to learn how to properly use sonames. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet@xxxxxxxxx> PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
