On Monday 24 March 2008, Axel Thimm wrote: > Whatever the hardwired defaults at compile time > the /etc/sysconfig/vdr takes precedence. So the package's scripts can > easily autoadjust to whatever situation. Good to hear you know better; I expect to see code to back that up if the draft passes with a mandate to change the dirs :) > But that would be wrong. One of the main FHS aspects is that a package [...] We already do some things "wrong" wrt the FHS, for example /etc/rc.d/init.d and /usr/libexec. I'm not aware of much movement in getting those fixed although unlike /srv, they don't deal directly with user data and could conceivably be easier and safer to fix. (Right, this is not a reason to allow more wrongdoings, but they're in the same boat of kinda "this is how things have been traditionally done, and we don't think it's worth the trouble to change these particular cases".) > Just to reiterate: The /srv/vdr folder currently breaks all > /srv/<domain> setups. Sure, if you happen to have a <domain> dir called vdr there for some other purpose. Similar things could be said about /var/lib/vdr or /var/spool/vdr. -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
