On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 05:23:00PM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Monday 24 March 2008, Axel Thimm wrote: > > Whatever the hardwired defaults at compile time the > > /etc/sysconfig/vdr takes precedence. So the package's scripts can > > easily autoadjust to whatever situation. > > Good to hear you know better; I expect to see code to back that up if the > draft passes with a mandate to change the dirs :) Sure, that's what the FPC's jobs is: to go hunt all packages and fix them. Good that I'm not a member anymore ;) Of course, the more serious answer is that this is the packager's job. > > But that would be wrong. One of the main FHS aspects is that a > > package [...] > > We already do some things "wrong" wrt the FHS, for example > /etc/rc.d/init.d and /usr/libexec. So that justifies breaking even more? > I'm not aware of much movement in getting those fixed Well, check the todo lists and your IRC logs, I was trying to get the libexec stuff addressed and some steps where done, including an official submission for a change in the FHS, but it now needs a new (Fedora) driver to get this pushed further. So things are done to get Fedora in sync with FHS. I'm not aware what the /etc/rc.d/init.d issues are to comment on that, but if there's a deviation the FPC should look at it (if it hasn't done so already). > > Just to reiterate: The /srv/vdr folder currently breaks all > > /srv/<domain> setups. > > Sure, if you happen to have a <domain> dir called vdr there for some other > purpose. Of if my scripts run over these folders and suddenly assume I'm hosting a "vdr" domain. There are reasons the FHS explicitely forbids vendors to mess in there. > Similar things could be said about /var/lib/vdr or /var/spool/vdr. No, the (limited) freedom of choice in the layout to the user/admin is solely under /srv (and /opt, /usr/local). -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpVeh23tQ849.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging