On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 10:40:30AM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Sunday 23 March 2008, Axel Thimm wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 10:20:10PM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > > > > I suppose that's possible (didn't think of that, thanks), but will > > > lead to more or less fragile config file modifications in > > > scriptlets. > > > > Why fragile? It either checks whether a previous vdr config told vdr > > to put files there or looks whether /srv/vdr exists. > > Previous config doesn't tell vdr anything, it uses compile time defaults, > > If it is a new install then have the user decide where he needs > > his data being placed in. > > They can already configure it in /etc/sysconfig/vdr. That's what I mean. Whatever the hardwired defaults at compile time the /etc/sysconfig/vdr takes precedence. So the package's scripts can easily autoadjust to whatever situation. For correctness sake (imagine someone calling vdr manually) the compile time defaults should be w/o any /srv bits. > > As said if the data is there leave it there. > > Just in case it wasn't clear, I meant leaving not only the data there but the > package and its dir ownerships as is too. But that would be wrong. One of the main FHS aspects is that a package should not remove anything (e.g. not own anything) beneath /srv. And that's what the draft also tried to map into the guidelines. Just to reiterate: The /srv/vdr folder currently breaks all /srv/<domain> setups. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpZKYV1goC1p.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
