On Mon May 19 2008, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 17:14 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > > As this isn't the first time that this (broken deps reports citing > > missing /bin/sh etc.) has happened, would it not be possible to add a > > sanity check on the broken deps script to avoid the mails if "obvious" > > things like /bin/sh are seen not to be available? > > It's possible sure. Just not something I'm probably going to get time > to do. The code is in the releng git repo, in the scripts/ dir > > http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=releng;a=summary I believe it is somewhere else because a "grep -Ri broken *" on a cloned repository did not show the "Broken dependencies" subject that the mails should have. I want to suggest to add a check whether or not the amount of broken packages is sane, e.g. up to 100. And in case it is not, the script could add a note to the mail sent to fedora-devel and maybe releng or whover would have to take a look then or only skip the individual reports. Regards, Till
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
