>>>>> "TC" == Tom \"spot\" Callaway <Tom> writes: TC> Either way, I don't think it prevents these updates from going in, TC> and should be handled as a separate issue. I agree, and you'll note that I believe that he was convinced that this wasn't a new issue with the guidelines changes. (Hence the change to +0 at the end of the log.) Of course, we should still try to address the issue. Is there actually a demonstrable problem here? What can go wrong without some arch-specific dependencies on the main ocaml package? Can you have just the 32-bit ocaml installed on a 64-bit machine and install a 64-bit module without rpm/yum complaining about dependency problems or pulling in the 64-bit ocaml package? (No 64-bit machine I can afford to screw with at the moment.) - J< -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
