Re: Suggestion: require inclusion of cvs location in completed review request

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "HdG" == Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx> writes:

HdG> This means yet another step in getting a package included, we
HdG> need less steps not more.

I agree; it's also yet another bit of bugspam in a process that
generates a huge load of it as it is.

As long as we keep the package name in the summary correct, the
CVS location is trivially derived from that and thus entirely
redundant.  So sure, better document how to get to imported packages
in the wiki all you want.  But please, no additional demands on the
already burdensome review process.

 - J<

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux