On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I see a few Lua packages have appeared in the review queue today. > > I checked out the specs and they all seem very clean. There are a few > issues (/usr/lib/lua seems to be unowned in rawhide, although > /usr/lib/lua/5.1 is owned by the lua package), the luasql packages > leave /usr/lib/lua/5.1/luasql unowned, etc.) but these seem to be > minor packaging issues. > > So, we need to decide whether we want to just go ahead with these > packages, or whether we want to do the "wait for guidelines" game > again. Is anyone interesting in writing some guidleines? It seems > like they'd be pretty tiny. Hans, the main Lua package seems to be > yours; are you interested in putting something together? > Lua SIG, anyone? It's a potentially more exciting language than Python and Ruby: a properly functional scripting language! -- Michel Salim http://hircus.jaiku.com/ -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
