On Thu, 15 May 2008 18:37:31 -0400 "W. Michael Petullo" <mike@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I released a bugfix in the form of: > >> > >> mt-daapd-0.9-0.4.1696.fc8 > >> mt-daapd-0.9-0.2.1696.fc9 > >> mt-daapd-0.9-0.2.1696.el5 > >> > >> I had thought that the next release would be in the 0.9 series. > >> > >> Now, the bugfix is upstream and the author has released the next > >> version of mt-daapd. Unfortunately, this version is 0.2.4.2, which > >> is lower that the versions above. I'd like to supercede the > >> packages above with this "lower" version number. > >> > >> What is the best way to handle this? I'd like to avoid using the > >> 0.9 version, as the developer has not moved to this yet upstream. > > > Epoch bump? > > As far as I know, the epoch does not override the version for the > update path. Overriding the version is the entire raison d'être of epoch, isn't it? Paul. -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
