>>>> I released a bugfix in the form of: >>>> >>>> mt-daapd-0.9-0.4.1696.fc8 >>>> mt-daapd-0.9-0.2.1696.fc9 >>>> mt-daapd-0.9-0.2.1696.el5 >>>> >>>> I had thought that the next release would be in the 0.9 series. >>>> >>>> Now, the bugfix is upstream and the author has released the next >>>> version of mt-daapd. Unfortunately, this version is 0.2.4.2, which >>>> is lower that the versions above. I'd like to supercede the >>>> packages above with this "lower" version number. >>>> >>>> What is the best way to handle this? I'd like to avoid using the >>>> 0.9 version, as the developer has not moved to this yet upstream. >>> Epoch bump? >> As far as I know, the epoch does not override the version for the >> update path. > Overriding the version is the entire raison d'être of epoch, isn't it? Please excuse my ignorance. I have read up on the epoch and you are right -- it provides the solution to my problem. Thanks! -- Mike :wq -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging