> I recently followed another distribution's lead and made some assumptions > about the version numbering of a package I maintain, mt-daapd. > > I released a bugfix in the form of: > > mt-daapd-0.9-0.4.1696.fc8 > mt-daapd-0.9-0.2.1696.fc9 > mt-daapd-0.9-0.2.1696.el5 > > I had thought that the next release would be in the 0.9 series. > > Now, the bugfix is upstream and the author has released the next version > of mt-daapd. Unfortunately, this version is 0.2.4.2, which is lower that > the versions above. I'd like to supercede the packages above with this > "lower" version number. > > What is the best way to handle this? I'd like to avoid using the 0.9 > version, as the developer has not moved to this yet upstream. Epoch bump? > Mike > > -- > Fedora-packaging mailing list > Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging > -- novus ordo absurdum -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
