>> I recently followed another distribution's lead and made some assumptions >> about the version numbering of a package I maintain, mt-daapd. >> >> I released a bugfix in the form of: >> >> mt-daapd-0.9-0.4.1696.fc8 >> mt-daapd-0.9-0.2.1696.fc9 >> mt-daapd-0.9-0.2.1696.el5 >> >> I had thought that the next release would be in the 0.9 series. >> >> Now, the bugfix is upstream and the author has released the next version >> of mt-daapd. Unfortunately, this version is 0.2.4.2, which is lower that >> the versions above. I'd like to supercede the packages above with this >> "lower" version number. >> >> What is the best way to handle this? I'd like to avoid using the 0.9 >> version, as the developer has not moved to this yet upstream. > Epoch bump? As far as I know, the epoch does not override the version for the update path. Mike -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
