Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I don't disagree, but "correct" and "workable" are different things; > as much as we wish it were so, we have to work with the rpm we have, > not the one we wish we had. Hmm, I understand that upstream might be less than tractable, but surely that doesn't prevent us from carrying our own patches that enforce restrictions that Fedora deems desirable. I don't like carrying distro-private patches more than anyone else; but when you're talking about fundamental bits of distro infrastructure, allowing someone else to dictate our project policy doesn't seem right. regards, tom lane -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
