Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > "CS" == Christopher Stone <chris.stone@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > CS> Shouldn't this be: ban use of > CS> Requires(RandomCrapWhichIsntSupportedYet) Otherwise, I can just > CS> change my Requires(hint) to Requires(opt) or some other random > CS> crap. > It would be disappointing to have to go to this level of lawyering. I > mean, who would actually do that? *Everyone* is only one typo away from invoking Requires(randomcrap). ISTM this is not a policy problem. The correct response to this is to fix our tools so that you get an error if the parenthesized string isn't one of the accepted values. If the tools enforce a list-of-accepted-values that's a bit stricter than upstream's, that's fine too; but what the heck are we doing allowing obvious mistakes in specfiles to pass? regards, tom lane -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
