Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > During the FESCo meeting, there was some question with regards to > ocaml multilib-osity-ness. I will admit to not fully understanding > what's up here, but can we address this and either fix it or provide > some response to fesco to assuage their concerns? > [13:10] <tibbs> I don't think the original, accepted guidelines are any better on this issue. > [13:11] <tibbs> So we're basically rejecting good changes because the original document has something that someone doesn't like. > [13:11] <tibbs> Which is... kind of backwards. The comments weren't relevant directly to what was being voted on, so, backwards/offtopic +1 here too. ?? -- Rex -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
