Re: Java packaging guidelines draft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Tom spot Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> [2008-03-27 15:25]:
> On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 15:13 -0400, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > An important reason we need the jpp in there currently is to maintain 
> > compatibility with JPackage.
> 
> We have never supported repository mixing. If anything, this serves as a
> good reason that JPackage should drop their disttag.
>

How many other repositories are there with the entire stack duplicated?
(not being sarcastic.. I really don't know of any). I know that there
were conflicts with Livna and what not a while ago, but those were for a
handful of packages only.

As for JPackage dropping their release tag policy -- not to be the devil's
advocate, but they were here before Fedora...

I have heard of numerous requests for technical arguments as to why the
string is needed. But where the technical arguments as to why it should
be removed? From what I have seen so far, reasons for that are pretty
much "Because it looks better, because it a policy, etc."

Cheers,
Deepak

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux