Re: Java packaging guidelines draft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Deepak Bhole wrote:

An important reason we need the jpp in there currently is to maintain compatibility with JPackage.

With the way the naming is right now, users can enable a JPackage
repository beside a Fedora repo, and are guaranteed to get the latest
either from Fedora or JPackage,...
...
e.g package foo is currently at 1.0-1jpp in jpackage and 1.0-1jpp.1 in

Stripping 'jpp' works fine (at least according to my quick-n-dirty use of rpmdev-vercmp:

1.0-1jpp < 1.0-2 < 1.0-2jpp

-- Rex

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux