* Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [2008-03-27 15:37]: > Deepak Bhole wrote: > >> An important reason we need the jpp in there currently is to maintain >> compatibility with JPackage. >> With the way the naming is right now, users can enable a JPackage >> repository beside a Fedora repo, and are guaranteed to get the latest >> either from Fedora or JPackage,... > ... >> e.g package foo is currently at 1.0-1jpp in jpackage and 1.0-1jpp.1 in > > Stripping 'jpp' works fine (at least according to my quick-n-dirty use of > rpmdev-vercmp: > > 1.0-1jpp < 1.0-2 < 1.0-2jpp > Until Fedora does a 1.0-3 to fix something, with the -3 still being split from the 1jpp, never having acquired the fixes from 1jpp->2jpp Cheers, Deepak > -- Rex > > -- > Fedora-packaging mailing list > Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
