On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 15:13 -0400, Deepak Bhole wrote: > An important reason we need the jpp in there currently is to maintain > compatibility with JPackage. > > With the way the naming is right now, users can enable a JPackage > repository beside a Fedora repo, and are guaranteed to get the latest > either from Fedora or JPackage, whichever is newer. Full stop. You can easily get this without the use of "jpp" text. I won't bother you with the details, but for this particular use of jpp you can absolutely do it without "jpp" in versions. > Without the jpp in > the release tag, this compatibility is broken. And it goes beyond the > packages themselves -- it also affects dependent packages, -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
