On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 08:18 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le vendredi 20 juin 2008 à 12:28 +1000, Andrew Bartlett a écrit :
> > On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 21:35 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 09:51 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > > I'm a bit lost on the use of %doc for manpages.
> > > >
> > > > I'm building a package of Heimdal Kerberos, so I'm following a lot of
> > > > the MIT krb5 package as a pattern.
> > > >
> > > > Should manpages be marked as %doc, or just other documentation?
> > >
> > > Files under /usr/share/{man,info} are automagically marked %doc by
> > > rpmbuild.
> >
> > Following the pattern long-established history and from the MIT krb5
> > pacakge, I'm using a new directory (yes, I know I need to ask approval)
> > of /usr/heimdal, so I think that means I need to manually mark them as %
> > doc.
>
> Please follow the FHS rules and do not create new roots where the FHS
> says you should not. I certainly hope the krb packages get fixed someday
> but in the meanwhile that's no reason to repeat their mistakes
No worries, I'll move them. (The MIT krb5 package's use of a non-FHS
prefix allows me to avoid conflicts ;-)
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
