Le mardi 26 février 2008 à 13:49 -0500, Bill Nottingham a écrit : > Bill Nottingham (notting@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > The biggest issue I could see is that any issues in handling such a package > > would need to be fixed *everywhere* that package is deployed, whether it > > be current Fedora, earlier Fedora, or EPEL. It may not be practical to > > deploy such fixes everywhere. > > Consider, for example, that such a package breaks bugzilla. Although I > suppose that's one way to avoid getting bug reports. The latest bugzilla versions are supposed to be UTF-8 compatible. Previous ones are just an encoding mess. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
