>>>>> "YN" == Yaakov Nemoy <loupgaroublond@xxxxxxxxx> writes: YN> There are still a few outstanding questions, but I think they YN> could be better answered by the Packaging Committee rather than YN> myself. Could you perhaps post the outstanding questions? It's a bit tough to figure out what's what, and wiki conversion has flattened any nested lists so the comments section just looks like a bunch of bullets.. Also, the new wiki has a proper discussion page; it might be simpler to use that and keep the main page for just the stuff that's actually guidelines. I see the last thing on the page is a request for FPC to comment on the casing of package names. I note that unfortuantely there is little concensus; Perl packages keep the upstream casing, but Perl package naming is relatively consistent. Python packages are generally, but not consistently, downcased. Personally I'd prefer just downcasing things, especially if there's no upstream consistency and the tools employed already downcase things. YN> Please let me know if there are to be any official meetings to YN> discuss details about this, so I can be present. Next meeting is July 15th, 17:00UTC. Is it possible to get a couple of packages made according to these guidelines? I know there are a few in the queue, but I'm not sure how they jibe with the proposed guidelines. - J< -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
