On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 15:04 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 09:26:10AM -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 10:57 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > Worth comparing what Debian do: > > > > > > http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-binarydeps > > > > you'll note debian doesn't specify behavior. So much in fact b/c, last > > time I checked, apt just lists out suggests/recommends to the terminal > > w/o doing anything with them. > > Even just listing them out is (IMHO) a good thing. Sometimes on > Debian I'll see a suggestion that looks worthwhile, kill the apt-get, > and start it again with the extra package. Of course what Debian is > then missing is an explanation of what the extra package does and why > it enhances the requested package, eg: > > yum install foo > > foo suggests bar > bar: with this package you will be able to foo bars as well > so the above does nothing for the most useful case of anaconda, then. -sv -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
