On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 06:28:46PM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 10:18 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > But, in my opinion, in packages that don't depend on each other, > > duplicating at least the license makes sense (though should not be > > mandatory). > > I've got no problem with this approach, although, I don't necessarily > want to encourage it, as it could get absurd in packages with a lot of > subpackages. Indeed. I have no problem with it being discouraged, as long as it is not forbidden (by the guidelines). -- Pat -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
