On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 17:00 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > Btw, there is also middleground that I haven't seen being discussed: > > What if we drop the "jpp", but keep the X from Xjpp? So foo-1.0-1jpp > > becomes foo-1.0-1.1 in Fedora. > > > > This would maintain compatibility, and would give us numeric > releases. > > This is actually permitted with the current guidelines. Not only that, but it was one of the suggested methods to rid ourselves of jpp. I do believe I had a complete working scheme using just numbers that left Jpackage with the ability to have "rpm newer" packages than those in Fedora. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
