On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 16:14 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Monday, 10 March 2008 at 15:24, Rex Dieter wrote: > > Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > >In one OCaml package: > > > > > BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434630 > > > spec: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-perl4caml.spec > > ... > > > On the other hand, maybe I should be allowed to > > > include an rpath in this situation because I really always want to be > > > linked to that particular libperl.so > > > > This is a case where rpath usage is acceptable, imo. > > I wonder why libperl is not a proper library then. I see that it has no SONAME. > Are there any plans upstream to make it a proper library? Not that I'm aware of. IMHO, this is a valid rpath exception case. ~spot -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
