Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>
> On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 17:51 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
>> As promised, here is my new proposed draft for handling static libs:
>>
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/StaticLibraryPolicy
> -1
>
> I don't understand the difference between #2 and #3.
>
> Also I don't find the *-nonshared packages useful.
>

I assume the point would be to ban BR: *-static in Fedora packages, but
allow BR: *-nonshared - i.e. when there is no alternative.  Is that
correct?

- orion

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux