Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> [ some other discussion ] > You seem to assume that the Fedora rpm developers will agree with you > and decide to change rpm; that is certainly not a given. Hm ... so this committee takes it as a given that the maintainer of RPM can arbitrarily reject any committee decision. That's completely fine with me, because transitive closure implies that I can ignore the committee's decisions for my own packages. I think I will unsubscribe now. Call me when you've grown some backbone. regards, tom lane -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
