Sorry for such late response, my laptop just died :'(( and since I'm in a conference, I have limited computer access.
As for the name, yes, it was one of my primary concerns. I figured that would have been resolved at the end. I thought about perhaps naming it root-analyzer.
At Jefferson Lab, where I'm at, we have our own version just called Analyzer. And it's very common to just think of it as root-analyzer. So that might work as a name. If need be, I guess I'll have to dwell into the code and change the names of the binaries and various daemons.
I submitted the spec and source file in for review. Thank you all for your early pre-reviews.
--Juan Carlos
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> "SV" == Seth Vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
SV> You'd think that, alas, this is not to be so. :(
Well, we can at least choose a reasonable name for the Fedora package;
renaming the daemons and executables is probably a bit much to ask,
unless they conflict with those from other packages.
SV> I had to deal with root for years. It likes to run a daemon named
SV> 'rootd'. There's nothing that makes a sysadmin cringe up like a
SV> process named 'rootd'
I can only imagine what happens when a user says "I need root on my
machine".
- J<
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
