On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 13:00 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > Looks good. > > There are other questions that should be answered, however, in my opinion > (with external sources of information if possible, no need to be fedora > centric). > > What is the criteria for being a crypto technology? It is easy to spot > many packages that are not crypto, but for others it is not very clear > to me. For example at which point a math library becomes a crypto > library? And what about an applicatin that compute hashes? Also does the > registration need to be done each time there is a new release or once > for all? These are all good questions, and we need to get Steve Grubb plugged in here to answer some of these. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
