Re: Drafts for next Tuesday

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 22:58 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Tom spot Callaway (tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > InitDir location (spot) :
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/InitDir
> 
> Should this just be merged into the later draft?

Yes, and it is now merged into that draft. :)

> 1) I'm of the opinion that LSB headers should be optional. There is no
> requirement in the LSB for any system scripts to be LSB compliant, and
> it can cause issues with ordering.

Indeed, I agree with this. I've amended the draft to make it very clear
that LSB headers are optional.


> This is incorrect. 

(lots of good text snipped)

Thanks for the correction. I've fixed the mistakes and added a section
which is essentially your explanation on how LSB Provides work in
Fedora.

> 3) Standardizing on try-restart when we have generally accepted use of
> 'condrestart' seems problematic.

Agreed. Its now all condrestart.

Thanks for taking the time to review this,

~spot

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux