I have the package here: Spec URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/truecrypt.spec SRPM URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/truecrypt-5.0a-1.src.rpm but the licence is a bit of a mess. It's a collection of licences, including: * TrueCrypt Licence Version 2.4: doesn't allow distributing patched versions and calling them TrueCrypt. Otherwise it's similar to BSD with advertising clause. * Licence agreement for Encryption for the Masses: similar to the above * SSLeay licence * some BSD licence (alternatively GPL) * some attribution only licence * another BSD-like licence Is this acceptable for Fedora? Regards, R. -- Fedora contributor http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DominikMierzejewski Livna contributor http://rpm.livna.org MPlayer developer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging